
Ubuntushows
Add a review FollowOverview
-
Founded Date November 12, 1914
-
Sectors Transportation
-
Posted Jobs 0
-
Viewed 6
Company Description
This Stage used 3 Reward Models
DeepSeek (Chinese: 深度求索; pinyin: Shēndù Qiúsuǒ) is a Chinese synthetic intelligence company that develops open-source big language models (LLMs). Based in Hangzhou, Zhejiang, it is owned and moneyed by Chinese hedge fund High-Flyer, whose co-founder, Liang Wenfeng, established the company in 2023 and functions as its CEO.
The DeepSeek-R1 design offers responses comparable to other modern big language designs, such as OpenAI’s GPT-4o and o1. [1] It is trained at a significantly lower cost-stated at US$ 6 million compared to $100 million for OpenAI’s GPT-4 in 2023 [2] -and requires a tenth of the computing power of an equivalent LLM. [2] [3] [4] DeepSeek’s AI models were developed in the middle of United States sanctions on India and China for Nvidia chips, [5] which were intended to restrict the ability of these 2 countries to develop innovative AI systems. [6] [7]
On 10 January 2025, DeepSeek released its very first totally free chatbot app, based upon the DeepSeek-R1 model, for iOS and Android; by 27 January, DeepSeek-R1 had actually gone beyond ChatGPT as the most-downloaded totally free app on the iOS App Store in the United States, [8] causing Nvidia’s share price to drop by 18%. [9] [10] DeepSeek’s success versus larger and more recognized rivals has been explained as “upending AI”, [8] making up “the very first chance at what is becoming an international AI space race”, [11] and introducing “a new era of AI brinkmanship”. [12]
DeepSeek makes its generative expert system algorithms, designs, and training information open-source, allowing its code to be freely offered for use, adjustment, watching, and creating documents for building purposes. [13] The company supposedly strongly recruits young AI researchers from top Chinese universities, [8] and works with from outside the computer science field to diversify its designs’ knowledge and capabilities. [3]
In February 2016, High-Flyer was co-founded by AI lover Liang Wenfeng, who had actually been trading considering that the 2007-2008 financial crisis while attending Zhejiang University. [14] By 2019, he developed High-Flyer as a hedge fund concentrated on establishing and using AI trading algorithms. By 2021, High-Flyer solely utilized AI in trading. [15] DeepSeek has made its generative expert system chatbot open source, indicating its code is freely readily available for usage, adjustment, and watching. This consists of consent to access and use the source code, along with design documents, for . [13]
According to 36Kr, Liang had built up a store of 10,000 Nvidia A100 GPUs, which are used to train AI [16], before the United States federal government enforced AI chip constraints on China. [15]
In April 2023, High-Flyer began an artificial basic intelligence laboratory dedicated to research study establishing AI tools separate from High-Flyer’s monetary business. [17] [18] In May 2023, with High-Flyer as one of the financiers, the lab became its own business, DeepSeek. [15] [19] [18] Venture capital firms hesitated in offering funding as it was unlikely that it would be able to generate an exit in a short time period. [15]
After launching DeepSeek-V2 in May 2024, which used strong performance for a low price, DeepSeek became known as the catalyst for China’s AI model rate war. It was quickly dubbed the “Pinduoduo of AI“, and other major tech giants such as ByteDance, Tencent, Baidu, and Alibaba started to cut the price of their AI models to complete with the company. Despite the low rate charged by DeepSeek, it paid compared to its rivals that were losing cash. [20]
DeepSeek is concentrated on research and has no detailed prepare for commercialization; [20] this also permits its technology to prevent the most rigid provisions of China’s AI regulations, such as needing consumer-facing innovation to comply with the federal government’s controls on details. [3]
DeepSeek’s hiring preferences target technical capabilities rather than work experience, leading to a lot of brand-new hires being either recent university graduates or designers whose AI professions are less developed. [18] [3] Likewise, the company hires individuals with no computer system science background to help its technology understand other topics and knowledge locations, consisting of having the ability to produce poetry and carry out well on the notoriously tough Chinese college admissions examinations (Gaokao). [3]
Development and release history
DeepSeek LLM
On 2 November 2023, DeepSeek launched its very first series of design, DeepSeek-Coder, which is offered free of charge to both researchers and industrial users. The code for the model was made open-source under the MIT license, with an extra license arrangement (“DeepSeek license”) concerning “open and responsible downstream usage” for the model itself. [21]
They are of the exact same architecture as DeepSeek LLM detailed listed below. The series consists of 8 designs, 4 pretrained (Base) and 4 instruction-finetuned (Instruct). They all have 16K context lengths. The training was as follows: [22] [23] [24]
1. Pretraining: 1.8 T tokens (87% source code, 10% code-related English (GitHub markdown and Stack Exchange), and 3% code-unrelated Chinese).
2. Long-context pretraining: 200B tokens. This extends the context length from 4K to 16K. This produced the Base designs.
3. Supervised finetuning (SFT): 2B tokens of instruction data. This produced the Instruct designs.
They were trained on clusters of A100 and H800 Nvidia GPUs, linked by InfiniBand, NVLink, NVSwitch. [22]
On 29 November 2023, DeepSeek released the DeepSeek-LLM series of designs, with 7B and 67B parameters in both Base and Chat kinds (no Instruct was launched). It was established to compete with other LLMs available at the time. The paper declared benchmark outcomes higher than most open source LLMs at the time, particularly Llama 2. [26]: section 5 Like DeepSeek Coder, the code for the design was under MIT license, with DeepSeek license for the design itself. [27]
The architecture was basically the same as those of the Llama series. They utilized the pre-norm decoder-only Transformer with RMSNorm as the normalization, SwiGLU in the feedforward layers, rotary positional embedding (RoPE), and grouped-query attention (GQA). Both had vocabulary size 102,400 (byte-level BPE) and context length of 4096. They trained on 2 trillion tokens of English and Chinese text obtained by deduplicating the Common Crawl. [26]
The Chat versions of the 2 Base designs was also launched simultaneously, acquired by training Base by monitored finetuning (SFT) followed by direct policy optimization (DPO). [26]
On 9 January 2024, they released 2 DeepSeek-MoE designs (Base, Chat), each of 16B specifications (2.7 B triggered per token, 4K context length). The training was essentially the exact same as DeepSeek-LLM 7B, and was trained on a part of its training dataset. They declared comparable performance with a 16B MoE as a 7B non-MoE. In architecture, it is a version of the standard sparsely-gated MoE, with “shared professionals” that are constantly queried, and “routed professionals” that might not be. They found this to assist with expert balancing. In basic MoE, some professionals can become extremely relied on, while other experts may be rarely used, squandering parameters. Attempting to stabilize the specialists so that they are equally utilized then triggers professionals to reproduce the very same capacity. They proposed the shared specialists to learn core capabilities that are frequently used, and let the routed professionals to find out the peripheral capabilities that are seldom utilized. [28]
In April 2024, they launched 3 DeepSeek-Math designs specialized for doing math: Base, Instruct, RL. It was trained as follows: [29]
1. Initialize with a previously pretrained DeepSeek-Coder-Base-v1.5 7B.
2. Further pretrain with 500B tokens (6% DeepSeekMath Corpus, 4% AlgebraicStack, 10% arXiv, 20% GitHub code, 10% Common Crawl). This produced the Base design.
3. Train an instruction-following design by SFT Base with 776K mathematics issues and their tool-use-integrated step-by-step solutions. This produced the Instruct model.
Reinforcement knowing (RL): The benefit model was a process reward design (PRM) trained from Base according to the Math-Shepherd technique. [30] This benefit model was then used to train Instruct using group relative policy optimization (GRPO) on a dataset of 144K mathematics questions “associated to GSM8K and MATH”. The benefit design was continually updated during training to avoid benefit hacking. This led to the RL model.
V2
In May 2024, they released the DeepSeek-V2 series. The series includes 4 models, 2 base designs (DeepSeek-V2, DeepSeek-V2-Lite) and 2 chatbots (-Chat). The two bigger models were trained as follows: [31]
1. Pretrain on a dataset of 8.1 T tokens, where Chinese tokens are 12% more than English ones.
2. Extend context length from 4K to 128K utilizing YaRN. [32] This resulted in DeepSeek-V2.
3. SFT with 1.2 M circumstances for helpfulness and 0.3 M for security. This resulted in DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT) which was not launched.
4. RL using GRPO in two stages. The first phase was trained to solve mathematics and coding problems. This phase used 1 benefit design, trained on compiler feedback (for coding) and ground-truth labels (for math). The 2nd phase was trained to be useful, safe, and follow guidelines. This phase used 3 reward designs. The helpfulness and security benefit designs were trained on human preference data. The rule-based reward model was by hand programmed. All experienced benefit models were initialized from DeepSeek-V2-Chat (SFT). This led to the released version of DeepSeek-V2-Chat.
They went with 2-staged RL, due to the fact that they found that RL on thinking information had “distinct attributes” various from RL on basic information. For instance, RL on reasoning could enhance over more training actions. [31]
The two V2-Lite models were smaller sized, and skilled similarly, though DeepSeek-V2-Lite-Chat only went through SFT, not RL. They trained the Lite variation to assist “additional research and development on MLA and DeepSeekMoE”. [31]
Architecturally, the V2 designs were considerably modified from the DeepSeek LLM series. They altered the standard attention mechanism by a low-rank approximation called multi-head latent attention (MLA), and utilized the mix of specialists (MoE) alternative previously released in January. [28]
The Financial Times reported that it was more affordable than its peers with a price of 2 RMB for each million output tokens. The University of Waterloo Tiger Lab’s leaderboard ranked DeepSeek-V2 seventh on its LLM ranking. [19]
In June 2024, they released 4 designs in the DeepSeek-Coder-V2 series: V2-Base, V2-Lite-Base, V2-Instruct, V2-Lite-Instruct. They were trained as follows: [35] [note 2]
1. The Base models were initialized from corresponding intermediate checkpoints after pretraining on 4.2 T tokens (not the version at the end of pretraining), then pretrained further for 6T tokens, then context-extended to 128K context length. This produced the Base models.
DeepSeek-Coder and DeepSeek-Math were utilized to generate 20K code-related and 30K math-related instruction data, then combined with a guideline dataset of 300M tokens. This was used for SFT.
2. RL with GRPO. The reward for mathematics issues was computed by comparing to the ground-truth label. The benefit for code problems was generated by a reward model trained to predict whether a program would pass the system tests.
DeepSeek-V2.5 was released in September and upgraded in December 2024. It was made by combining DeepSeek-V2-Chat and DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct. [36]
V3
In December 2024, they released a base design DeepSeek-V3-Base and a chat design DeepSeek-V3. The model architecture is basically the same as V2. They were trained as follows: [37]
1. Pretraining on 14.8 T tokens of a multilingual corpus, mainly English and Chinese. It consisted of a higher ratio of mathematics and shows than the pretraining dataset of V2.
2. Extend context length two times, from 4K to 32K and then to 128K, using YaRN. [32] This produced DeepSeek-V3-Base.
3. SFT for 2 epochs on 1.5 M samples of reasoning (math, shows, reasoning) and non-reasoning (imaginative writing, roleplay, easy concern answering) information. Reasoning data was created by “expert designs”. Non-reasoning data was produced by DeepSeek-V2.5 and checked by human beings. – The “expert designs” were trained by starting with an unspecified base design, then SFT on both data, and synthetic data created by an internal DeepSeek-R1 design. The system timely asked the R1 to show and confirm throughout thinking. Then the professional designs were RL using an undefined reward function.
– Each professional model was trained to produce just synthetic thinking information in one particular domain (math, programming, logic).
– Expert designs were used, rather of R1 itself, considering that the output from R1 itself suffered “overthinking, poor format, and extreme length”.
4. Model-based reward models were made by starting with a SFT checkpoint of V3, then finetuning on human choice data including both last reward and chain-of-thought causing the last reward. The reward model produced benefit signals for both questions with objective but free-form responses, and questions without objective answers (such as imaginative writing).
5. A SFT checkpoint of V3 was trained by GRPO utilizing both benefit models and rule-based benefit. The rule-based reward was calculated for math issues with a final response (put in a box), and for programs issues by unit tests. This produced DeepSeek-V3.
The DeepSeek group performed comprehensive low-level engineering to achieve performance. They utilized mixed-precision math. Much of the forward pass was carried out in 8-bit drifting point numbers (5E2M: 5-bit exponent and 2-bit mantissa) instead of the standard 32-bit, requiring special GEMM regimens to build up precisely. They utilized a custom 12-bit float (E5M6) for just the inputs to the direct layers after the attention modules. Optimizer states were in 16-bit (BF16). They reduced the communication latency by overlapping thoroughly calculation and interaction, such as committing 20 streaming multiprocessors out of 132 per H800 for just inter-GPU interaction. They lowered interaction by rearranging (every 10 minutes) the exact device each expert was on in order to avoid certain makers being queried more often than the others, including auxiliary load-balancing losses to the training loss function, and other load-balancing techniques. [37]
After training, it was released on H800 clusters. The H800 cards within a cluster are connected by NVLink, and the clusters are connected by InfiniBand. [37]
Benchmark tests show that DeepSeek-V3 outshined Llama 3.1 and Qwen 2.5 whilst matching GPT-4o and Claude 3.5 Sonnet. [18] [39] [40] [41]
R1
On 20 November 2024, DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview became accessible through DeepSeek’s API, as well as by means of a chat user interface after logging in. [42] [43] [note 3] It was trained for logical inference, mathematical reasoning, and real-time analytical. DeepSeek declared that it went beyond performance of OpenAI o1 on criteria such as American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME) and MATH. [44] However, The Wall Street Journal stated when it used 15 problems from the 2024 edition of AIME, the o1 model reached a service quicker than DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview. [45]
On 20 January 2025, DeepSeek released DeepSeek-R1 and DeepSeek-R1-Zero. [46] Both were initialized from DeepSeek-V3-Base, and share its architecture. The business likewise released some “DeepSeek-R1-Distill” designs, which are not initialized on V3-Base, however rather are initialized from other pretrained open-weight models, including LLaMA and Qwen, then fine-tuned on artificial data generated by R1. [47]
A conversation between User and Assistant. The user asks a concern, and the Assistant solves it. The assistant first considers the reasoning procedure in the mind and then offers the user with the response. The thinking process and answer are enclosed within and tags, respectively, i.e., thinking procedure here address here. User:. Assistant:
DeepSeek-R1-Zero was trained specifically utilizing GRPO RL without SFT. Unlike previous variations, they utilized no model-based reward. All reward functions were rule-based, “primarily” of two types (other types were not specified): accuracy rewards and format rewards. Accuracy reward was inspecting whether a boxed answer is proper (for math) or whether a code passes tests (for shows). Format reward was inspecting whether the model puts its thinking trace within … [47]
As R1-Zero has problems with readability and blending languages, R1 was trained to deal with these issues and additional enhance reasoning: [47]
1. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on “thousands” of “cold-start” information all with the basic format of|special_token|| special_token|summary >.
2. Apply the very same RL process as R1-Zero, however also with a “language consistency reward” to motivate it to react monolingually. This produced an internal design not launched.
3. Synthesize 600K thinking information from the internal design, with rejection tasting (i.e. if the produced reasoning had an incorrect last answer, then it is removed). Synthesize 200K non-reasoning information (writing, accurate QA, self-cognition, translation) utilizing DeepSeek-V3.
4. SFT DeepSeek-V3-Base on the 800K synthetic data for 2 epochs.
5. GRPO RL with rule-based reward (for thinking jobs) and model-based reward (for non-reasoning jobs, helpfulness, and harmlessness). This produced DeepSeek-R1.
Distilled models were trained by SFT on 800K information manufactured from DeepSeek-R1, in a comparable method as action 3 above. They were not trained with RL. [47]
Assessment and reactions
DeepSeek launched its AI Assistant, which uses the V3 design as a chatbot app for Apple IOS and Android. By 27 January 2025 the app had exceeded ChatGPT as the highest-rated totally free app on the iOS App Store in the United States; its chatbot reportedly responds to concerns, resolves reasoning issues and composes computer system programs on par with other chatbots on the marketplace, according to benchmark tests utilized by American AI business. [3]
DeepSeek-V3 utilizes considerably less resources compared to its peers; for instance, whereas the world’s leading AI business train their chatbots with supercomputers using as lots of as 16,000 graphics processing units (GPUs), if not more, DeepSeek declares to require just about 2,000 GPUs, namely the H800 series chip from Nvidia. [37] It was trained in around 55 days at an expense of US$ 5.58 million, [37] which is roughly one tenth of what United States tech giant Meta invested building its latest AI technology. [3]
DeepSeek’s competitive efficiency at relatively minimal expense has been recognized as possibly challenging the global supremacy of American AI designs. [48] Various publications and news media, such as The Hill and The Guardian, explained the release of its chatbot as a “Sputnik minute” for American AI. [49] [50] The efficiency of its R1 model was reportedly “on par with” among OpenAI’s newest models when utilized for jobs such as mathematics, coding, and natural language reasoning; [51] echoing other analysts, American Silicon Valley investor Marc Andreessen also described R1 as “AI’s Sputnik minute”. [51]
DeepSeek’s creator, Liang Wenfeng has been compared to Open AI CEO Sam Altman, with CNN calling him the Sam Altman of China and an evangelist for AI. [52] Chinese state media widely praised DeepSeek as a national possession. [53] [54] On 20 January 2025, China’s Premier Li Qiang welcomed Liang Wenfeng to his symposium with specialists and asked him to supply viewpoints and suggestions on a draft for remarks of the annual 2024 federal government work report. [55]
DeepSeek’s optimization of limited resources has actually highlighted possible limits of United States sanctions on China’s AI development, that include export restrictions on advanced AI chips to China [18] [56] The success of the company’s AI designs consequently “stimulated market turmoil” [57] and caused shares in significant global technology companies to plunge on 27 January 2025: Nvidia’s stock fell by as much as 17-18%, [58] as did the stock of rival Broadcom. Other tech firms also sank, consisting of Microsoft (down 2.5%), Google’s owner Alphabet (down over 4%), and Dutch chip equipment maker ASML (down over 7%). [51] A global selloff of innovation stocks on Nasdaq, prompted by the release of the R1 design, had actually caused tape-record losses of about $593 billion in the market capitalizations of AI and computer system hardware companies; [59] by 28 January 2025, a total of $1 trillion of value was rubbed out American stocks. [50]
Leading figures in the American AI sector had combined responses to DeepSeek’s success and performance. [60] Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman-whose companies are associated with the United States government-backed “Stargate Project” to develop American AI infrastructure-both called DeepSeek “extremely outstanding”. [61] [62] American President Donald Trump, who announced The Stargate Project, called DeepSeek a wake-up call [63] and a positive development. [64] [50] [51] [65] Other leaders in the field, consisting of Scale AI CEO Alexandr Wang, Anthropic cofounder and CEO Dario Amodei, and Elon Musk expressed suspicion of the app’s efficiency or of the sustainability of its success. [60] [66] [67] Various business, consisting of Amazon Web Services, Toyota, and Stripe, are looking for to use the design in their program. [68]
On 27 January 2025, DeepSeek restricted its new user registration to contact number from mainland China, email addresses, or Google account logins, following a “massive” cyberattack disrupted the appropriate performance of its servers. [69] [70]
Some sources have observed that the main application programs user interface (API) variation of R1, which runs from servers located in China, utilizes censorship mechanisms for topics that are considered politically sensitive for the government of China. For instance, the design declines to answer concerns about the 1989 Tiananmen Square protests and massacre, persecution of Uyghurs, contrasts in between Xi Jinping and Winnie the Pooh, or human rights in China. [71] [72] [73] The AI may at first produce a response, but then deletes it quickly later on and replaces it with a message such as: “Sorry, that’s beyond my current scope. Let’s speak about something else.” [72] The incorporated censorship systems and restrictions can just be eliminated to a restricted level in the open-source variation of the R1 design. If the “core socialist values” defined by the Chinese Internet regulatory authorities are touched upon, or the political status of Taiwan is raised, conversations are ended. [74] When checked by NBC News, DeepSeek’s R1 described Taiwan as “an inalienable part of China’s area,” and stated: “We securely oppose any type of ‘Taiwan self-reliance’ separatist activities and are dedicated to accomplishing the total reunification of the motherland through serene means.” [75] In January 2025, Western researchers were able to deceive DeepSeek into offering certain answers to some of these topics by requesting in its answer to swap certain letters for similar-looking numbers. [73]
Security and personal privacy
Some specialists fear that the federal government of China might use the AI system for foreign influence operations, spreading disinformation, security and the advancement of cyberweapons. [76] [77] [78] DeepSeek’s privacy conditions state “We store the details we gather in safe servers found in individuals’s Republic of China … We might gather your text or audio input, prompt, uploaded files, feedback, chat history, or other content that you supply to our design and Services”. Although the information storage and collection policy follows ChatGPT’s privacy policy, [79] a Wired article reports this as security issues. [80] In response, the Italian data protection authority is looking for additional info on DeepSeek’s collection and usage of personal information, and the United States National Security Council announced that it had started a nationwide security evaluation. [81] [82] Taiwan’s federal government banned making use of DeepSeek at government ministries on security premises and South Korea’s Personal Information Protection Commission opened an inquiry into DeepSeek’s use of personal information. [83]
Artificial intelligence industry in China.
Notes
^ a b c The variety of heads does not equivalent the number of KV heads, due to GQA.
^ Inexplicably, the model called DeepSeek-Coder-V2 Chat in the paper was released as DeepSeek-Coder-V2-Instruct in HuggingFace.
^ At that time, the R1-Lite-Preview required picking “Deep Think made it possible for”, and every user might use it just 50 times a day.
References
^ Gibney, Elizabeth (23 January 2025). “China’s cheap, open AI design DeepSeek delights researchers”. Nature. doi:10.1038/ d41586-025-00229-6. ISSN 1476-4687. PMID 39849139.
^ a b Vincent, James (28 January 2025). “The DeepSeek panic reveals an AI world all set to blow”. The Guardian.
^ a b c d e f g Metz, Cade; Tobin, Meaghan (23 January 2025). “How Chinese A.I. Start-Up DeepSeek Is Taking On Silicon Valley Giants”. The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Cosgrove, Emma (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s cheaper models and weaker chips cast doubt on trillions in AI facilities costs”. Business Insider.
^ Mallick, Subhrojit (16 January 2024). “Biden admin’s cap on GPU exports might strike India’s AI aspirations”. The Economic Times. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Saran, Cliff (10 December 2024). “Nvidia examination signals widening of US and China chip war|Computer Weekly”. Computer Weekly. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Sherman, Natalie (9 December 2024). “Nvidia targeted by China in new chip war probe”. BBC. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c Metz, Cade (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek? And How Is It Upending A.I.?”. The New York City Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Field, Hayden (27 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI dethrones ChatGPT on App Store: Here’s what you need to understand”. CNBC.
^ Picchi, Aimee (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, and why is it triggering Nvidia and other stocks to slump?”. CBS News.
^ Zahn, Max (27 January 2025). “Nvidia, Microsoft shares topple as China-based AI app DeepSeek hammers tech giants”. ABC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Roose, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Why DeepSeek Could Change What Silicon Valley Believe About A.I.” The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b Romero, Luis E. (28 January 2025). “ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Or Llama? Meta’s LeCun Says Open-Source Is The Key”. Forbes.
^ Chen, Caiwei (24 January 2025). “How a top Chinese AI design conquered US sanctions”. MIT Technology Review. Archived from the initial on 25 January 2025. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c d Ottinger, Lily (9 December 2024). “Deepseek: From Hedge Fund to Frontier Model Maker”. ChinaTalk. Archived from the original on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Leswing, Kif (23 February 2023). “Meet the $10,000 Nvidia chip powering the race for A.I.” CNBC. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ Yu, Xu (17 April 2023).” [Exclusive] Chinese Quant Hedge Fund High-Flyer Won’t Use AGI to Trade Stocks, MD Says”. Yicai Global. Archived from the original on 31 December 2023. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b c d e Jiang, Ben; Perezi, Bien (1 January 2025). “Meet DeepSeek: the Chinese start-up that is changing how AI models are trained”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the initial on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 1 January 2025.
^ a b McMorrow, Ryan; Olcott, Eleanor (9 June 2024). “The Chinese quant fund-turned-AI pioneer”. Financial Times. Archived from the initial on 17 July 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ a b Schneider, Jordan (27 November 2024). “Deepseek: The Quiet Giant Leading China’s AI Race”. ChinaTalk. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek-Coder/LICENSE-MODEL at main · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder”. GitHub. Archived from the original on 22 January 2025. Retrieved 24 January 2025.
^ a b c Guo, Daya; Zhu, Qihao; Yang, Dejian; Xie, Zhenda; Dong, Kai; Zhang, Wentao; Chen, Guanting; Bi, Xiao; Wu, Y. (26 January 2024), DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming – The Rise of Code Intelligence, arXiv:2401.14196.
^ “DeepSeek Coder”. deepseekcoder.github.io. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-Coder, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, obtained 27 January 2025.
^ “deepseek-ai/deepseek-coder -5.7 bmqa-base · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Bi, Xiao; Chen, Deli; Chen, Guanting; Chen, Shanhuang; Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Ding, Honghui; Dong, Kai (5 January 2024), DeepSeek LLM: Scaling Open-Source Language Models with Longtermism, arXiv:2401.02954.
^ deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-LLM, DeepSeek, 27 January 2025, obtained 27 January 2025.
^ a b Dai, Damai; Deng, Chengqi; Zhao, Chenggang; Xu, R. X.; Gao, Huazuo; Chen, Deli; Li, Jiashi; Zeng, Wangding; Yu, Xingkai (11 January 2024), DeepSeekMoE: Towards Ultimate Expert Specialization in Mixture-of-Experts Language Models, arXiv:2401.06066.
^ Shao, Zhihong; Wang, Peiyi; Zhu, Qihao; Xu, Runxin; Song, Junxiao; Bi, Xiao; Zhang, Haowei; Zhang, Mingchuan; Li, Y. K. (27 April 2024), DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Models, arXiv:2402.03300.
^ Wang, Peiyi; Li, Lei; Shao, Zhihong; Xu, R. X.; Dai, Damai; Li, Yifei; Chen, Deli; Wu, Y.; Sui, Zhifang (19 February 2024), Math-Shepherd: Verify and Reinforce LLMs Step-by-step without Human Annotations, arXiv:2312.08935. ^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Wang, Bin; Wang, Bingxuan; Liu, Bo; Zhao, Chenggang; Dengr, Chengqi; Ruan, Chong (19 June 2024), DeepSeek-V2: A Strong, Economical, and Efficient Mixture-of-Experts Language Model, arXiv:2405.04434.
^ a b Peng, Bowen; Quesnelle, Jeffrey; Fan, Honglu; Shippole, Enrico (1 November 2023), YaRN: Efficient Context Window Extension of Large Language Models, arXiv:2309.00071.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2-Lite at main”. huggingface.co. 15 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2 at primary”. huggingface.co. 6 May 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ DeepSeek-AI; Zhu, Qihao; Guo, Daya; Shao, Zhihong; Yang, Dejian; Wang, Peiyi; Xu, Runxin; Wu, Y.; Li, Yukun (17 June 2024), DeepSeek-Coder-V2: Breaking the Barrier of Closed-Source Models in Code Intelligence, arXiv:2406.11931.
^ “deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 2.5 · Hugging Face”. huggingface.co. 3 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ a b c d e f g DeepSeek-AI; Liu, Aixin; Feng, Bei; Xue, Bing; Wang, Bingxuan; Wu, Bochao; Lu, Chengda; Zhao, Chenggang; Deng, Chengqi (27 December 2024), DeepSeek-V3 Technical Report, arXiv:2412.19437.
^ “config.json · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-V 3 at primary”. huggingface.co. 26 December 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Jiang, Ben (27 December 2024). “Chinese start-up DeepSeek’s new AI model exceeds Meta, OpenAI products”. South China Morning Post. Archived from the original on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Sharma, Shubham (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek-V3, ultra-large open-source AI, outperforms Llama and Qwen on launch”. VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Wiggers, Kyle (26 December 2024). “DeepSeek’s new AI design seems one of the very best ‘open’ challengers yet”. TechCrunch. Archived from the original on 2 January 2025. Retrieved 31 December 2024.
^ “Deepseek Log in page”. DeepSeek. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “News|DeepSeek-R1-Lite Release 2024/11/20: DeepSeek-R1-Lite-Preview is now live: unleashing supercharged reasoning power!”. DeepSeek API Docs. Archived from the original on 20 November 2024. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Franzen, Carl (20 November 2024). “DeepSeek’s first reasoning model R1-Lite-Preview turns heads, beating OpenAI o1 performance”. VentureBeat. Archived from the initial on 22 November 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ Huang, Raffaele (24 December 2024). “Don’t Look Now, but China’s AI Is Catching Up Fast”. The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the initial on 27 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “Release DeepSeek-R1 · deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1@23807ce”. GitHub. Archived from the original on 21 January 2025. Retrieved 21 January 2025.
^ a b c d DeepSeek-AI; Guo, Daya; Yang, Dejian; Zhang, Haowei; Song, Junxiao; Zhang, Ruoyu; Xu, Runxin; Zhu, Qihao; Ma, Shirong (22 January 2025), DeepSeek-R1: Incentivizing Reasoning Capability in LLMs through Reinforcement Learning, arXiv:2501.12948.
^ “Chinese AI start-up DeepSeek surpasses ChatGPT on Apple App Store”. Reuters. 27 January 2025. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Wade, David (6 December 2024). “American AI has reached its Sputnik moment”. The Hill. Archived from the initial on 8 December 2024. Retrieved 25 January 2025.
^ a b c Milmo, Dan; Hawkins, Amy; Booth, Robert; Kollewe, Julia (28 January 2025). “‘ Sputnik minute’: $1tn wiped off US stocks after Chinese firm unveils AI chatbot” – through The Guardian.
^ a b c d Hoskins, Peter; Rahman-Jones, Imran (27 January 2025). “Nvidia shares sink as Chinese AI app spooks markets”. BBC. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Goldman, David (27 January 2025). “What is DeepSeek, the Chinese AI startup that shook the tech world?|CNN Business”. CNN. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ “DeepSeek positions a challenge to Beijing as much as to Silicon Valley”. The Economist. 29 January 2025. ISSN 0013-0613. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Paul, Katie; Nellis, Stephen (30 January 2025). “Chinese state-linked accounts hyped DeepSeek AI launch ahead of US stock rout, Graphika states”. Reuters. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ 澎湃新闻 (22 January 2025). “量化巨头幻方创始人梁文锋参加总理座谈会并发言 , 他还创办了” AI界拼多多””. finance.sina.com.cn. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
^ Shilov, Anton (27 December 2024). “Chinese AI business’s AI model development highlights limitations of US sanctions”. Tom’s Hardware. Archived from the initial on 28 December 2024. Retrieved 28 December 2024.
^ “DeepSeek updates – Chinese AI chatbot triggers US market turmoil, cleaning $500bn off Nvidia”. BBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Nazareth, Rita (26 January 2025). “Stock Rout Gets Ugly as Nvidia Extends Loss to 17%: Markets Wrap”. Bloomberg. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Carew, Sinéad; Cooper, Amanda; Banerjee, Ankur (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek sparks international AI selloff, Nvidia losses about $593 billion of worth”. Reuters.
^ a b Sherry, Ben (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek, Calling It ‘Impressive’ however Staying Skeptical”. Inc. Retrieved 29 January 2025.
^ Okemwa, Kevin (28 January 2025). “Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella touts DeepSeek’s open-source AI as “very excellent”: “We must take the developments out of China really, extremely seriously””. Windows Central. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Nazzaro, Miranda (28 January 2025). “OpenAI’s Sam Altman calls DeepSeek model ‘outstanding'”. The Hill. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Dou, Eva; Gregg, Aaron; Zakrzewski, Cat; Tiku, Nitasha; Najmabadi, Shannon (28 January 2025). “Trump calls China’s DeepSeek AI app a ‘wake-up call’ after tech stocks slide”. The Washington Post. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Habeshian, Sareen (28 January 2025). “Johnson slams China on AI, Trump calls DeepSeek advancement “favorable””. Axios.
^ Karaian, Jason; Rennison, Joe (27 January 2025). “China’s A.I. Advances Spook Big Tech Investors on Wall Street” – through NYTimes.com.
^ Sharma, Manoj (6 January 2025). “Musk dismisses, Altman applauds: What leaders say on DeepSeek’s interruption”. Fortune India. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Elon Musk ‘questions’ DeepSeek’s claims, suggests massive Nvidia GPU facilities”. Financialexpress. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Kim, Eugene. “Big AWS clients, consisting of Stripe and Toyota, are hounding the cloud giant for access to DeepSeek AI designs”. Business Insider.
^ Kerr, Dara (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek struck with ‘massive’ cyber-attack after AI chatbot tops app stores”. The Guardian. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Tweedie, Steven; Altchek, Ana. “DeepSeek briefly restricted brand-new sign-ups, pointing out ‘massive destructive attacks'”. Business Insider.
^ Field, Matthew; Titcomb, James (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI has actually sparked a $1 trillion panic – and it does not appreciate free speech”. The Daily Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Steinschaden, Jakob (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek: This is what live censorship appears like in the Chinese AI chatbot”. Trending Topics. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ a b Lu, Donna (28 January 2025). “We checked out DeepSeek. It worked well, up until we asked it about Tiananmen Square and Taiwan”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 30 January 2025.
^ “The Guardian view on a worldwide AI race: geopolitics, innovation and the rise of mayhem”. The Guardian. 26 January 2025. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Yang, Angela; Cui, Jasmine (27 January 2025). “Chinese AI DeepSeek shocks Silicon Valley, providing the AI race its ‘Sputnik moment'”. NBC News. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Kimery, Anthony (26 January 2025). “China’s DeepSeek AI positions formidable cyber, data privacy threats”. Biometric Update. Retrieved 27 January 2025.
^ Booth, Robert; Milmo, Dan (28 January 2025). “Experts advise caution over use of Chinese AI DeepSeek”. The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Hornby, Rael (28 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s success has actually painted a big TikTok-shaped target on its back”. LaptopMag. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Privacy policy”. Open AI. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Burgess, Matt; Newman, Lily Hay (27 January 2025). “DeepSeek’s Popular AI App Is Explicitly Sending US Data to China”. Wired. ISSN 1059-1028. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ “Italy regulator inquires from DeepSeek on data security”. Reuters. 28 January 2025. Retrieved 28 January 2025.
^ Shalal, Andrea; Shepardson, David (28 January 2025). “White House assesses impact of China AI app DeepSeek on nationwide security, authorities states”. Reuters. Retrieved 28 January 2025.